Founded in 1895, the Ingham County Bar Association continues its 119-year
tradition of service to the legal profession and the greater Lansing community,
bringing lawyers together to join in a strong organization that works
to achieve objectives that transcend the individual. The ICBA is proud
to provide programs and services designed to improve our local judicial
system, foster & enhance the quality of legal services in our community,
and provide educational and professional programs for our members. Welcome
to the Ingham County Bar Association!
Ingham County Bar Association Practical Guide
A Resource for New Attorneys
Admitted in Michigan
A PUBLICATION OF THE YOUNG LAWYERS SECTION
OF THE INGHAM COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
Task Force recommendations would dramatically change how the Michigan Supreme
Court justices are selected
By: Liisa R. Speaker
On April 26, 2012, the Judicial Selection Task Force held a press conference
at the State Capitol introducing its report and recommendations to overhaul
the selection process for the Michigan Supreme Court. Michigan Supreme
Court Justice Marilyn Kelly and Sixth Circuit Judge James Ryan co-chaired
the Task Force and presented the recommendations. Sandra Day O'Connor
served as Honorary Chair to the Task Force. The Task Force's report
is available at
The Task Force represents a bipartisan group of judges, attorneys, and
non-attorneys who came together in an attempt to remedy the negative image
of the Michigan Supreme Court. The Task Force is a private endeavor and
was funded by the State Bar Foundation, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation,
and the League of Women Voters. As noted in the Task Force's report,
Supreme Court elections in Michigan have "attracted national attention
for its excessive cost, its lack of transparency, and its damaging negativity."
The Task Force made six recommendations. Making the recommendations a reality
will involve a combination of legislative action, constitutional amendment,
and executive order.
1. Reform the Campaign Finance Act to require the names of PAC contributors to be publicly available. This
is the Task Force's first recommendation because Michigan has the
highest spending of all states for supreme court elections. As Judge Ryan
reported at the Task Force press conference, the 10th highest state (Iowa)
spent less than $2 million. The 2nd highest state (Pennsylvania, whose
population is larger than Michigan's) spent $5.5 million. Michigan
is in 1st place with expenditures of over $9 million for the supreme court
races, not including another $3 million from outside the State. Michigan's
campaign finance system was highlighted in a recent report on "The
New Politics of Judicial Elections: 2009-2010" (2011), available
That report noted that most of the spending on Michigan's Supreme
Court race came from special-interest groups, and that source of the special-interest
spending was concealed from the public.
2. Eliminate the selection of Supreme Court justices through the political parties. The Task Force highlighted the importance of this recommendation because
the allegedly nonpartisan judicial elections in Michigan ring hollow when
political parties nominate candidates for the Supreme Court. In fact,
the only way for a candidate to appear on the ballot is to secure the
nomination of a political party. Eliminating political parties from the
election process would give the public confidence in the nonpartisan elections.
3. Create a nonpartisan citizens' campaign oversight committee to monitor judicial campaign advertisements. The formation of the committee
would help reduce negative campaigns, which "weaken public confidence
in the justices." The oversight committee would check the factual
claims in advertisements and "denounce false, misleading, or destructive
4. Distribute a voters education guide to all registered voters, which would be prepared by the Secretary of
State. The guide would provide voters neutral information about each candidate
for the Supreme Court.
5. Create a nonpartisan Governor's Advisory Screening Committee consisting of nonpartisan attorneys and non-attorneys to advise the governor
on appointments to the Supreme Court. The Task Force noted that the Governor
would not be bound by the recommendation of the committee. The Task Force
further recommends that the names and credentials of the candidates under
consideration for the appointment to the supreme court be publicly available.
The Task Force noted that "this process would assure the public that
the Governor did not base his or her appointments on whim or political
patronage but instead on a sound examination of each candidate's suitability
6. Remove the age 70 limitation in the Michigan Constitution that prevents justices from running for election
or being appointed to the Michigan Supreme Court after their 70th birthday.
The Task Force also explored the possibility of creating a judicial nomination
committee which would replace the judicial election system for the Supreme
Court. This is often referred to as a "merit selection" system.
There are several models that could serve for a nomination-based system,
such as a gubernatorial appointment with legislative confirmation or gubernatorial
appointment with a retention election.
Although some member of the Task Force preferred a nominations system,
that is not one of the Task Force's recommendations. In any event,
if the six recommended changes were made to the judicial election system,
and if those changes succeeded in "restoring public confidence in
the supreme court, decreasing misleading attack advertisements, reducing
the influence of political parties, better educating voters, and reducing
undisclosed spending" then some members of the Task Force who favored
a nomination process would still view the reform as a success.
The Task Force recommendations are a significant first step in what will
certainly prove to be a long process to effectuating needed improvements
to the judicial election system for the Michigan Supreme Court.
Bio: Liisa R. Speaker is the Chair of the State Bar of Michigan's Appellate
We are pleased to announce that as a law student member of the Ingham County
Bar Association, you are eligible to sit it on case evaluations in the
Ingham County Circuit Court. Case evaluations are designed to assist parties
in a lawsuit in reaching a settlement. They generally occur after all
discovery in a civil lawsuit has been completed and before trial. A panel
of three experienced attorneys receives written briefs from the parties,
summarizing the case. The attorneys for the parties are then generally
given approximately 15 minutes per side to address the panel and respond
to questions. The panel then deliberates and reaches an evaluation, which
is a suggested settlement amount. The parties have 28 days thereafter
to accept or rejected the case evaluation. A party who rejects a case
evaluation is at risk of having to pay the other side's costs and
attorney fees, from the point of rejection forward, if they do not improve
their position at trial from the amount of the case evaluation. If the
parties accept the evaluation, the case settles for that amount.
Case evaluations are not open to the public and usually occur in a setting
where only the attorneys and panel members are permitted to be present.
In an effort to assist in the development of law students as they proceed
in their careers, the Chief Judge of the Ingham County Circuit Court,
the Honorable Janelle Lawless, has approved this program for law student
members of our Association. The panels of case evaluators specialize in
particular areas of law which are: tort, commercial litigation, and labor law.
If you are interested in attending a case evaluation, please complete the
Download Registration Form
We believe that you will find this program worthwhile to your development
as an attorney. It will give you a sense of how to prepare cases and inform
you as to the way that experienced attorneys assess the strengths and
weaknesses of a case. We encourage you to take advantage of this opportunity.
Sixty-Minute Mentoring is Back and Looking for You!
We all know that mentoring is critical to our profession. The best advice
we often receive is from attorneys who take a few minutes to share their
time and experience with us and answer our questions.
We hope that you are willing to spend 60 minutes – at a time, date,
and location that you select – to spend time with 1 or 2 new attorneys
or law students. You will be able to share information that only a practicing
attorney can offer.
For more information, please contact Kathy Lawrence email@example.com
if you are interested in being a mentor or if you are an attorney or law
student and interested in being mentored. If you can spare 60 minutes,
you can be a mentor!
To register for Ingham County Bar Association events - go to calendar tab.
You can register online or use a pdf registration form (when available).
Note: You can only register one person at a time using the online method.
When using the online method for paying with a credit card, please make
sure the address where the credit card statement/invoice is on record
matches correctly or you payment will be rejected.
Update your online membership profile
Have you visited your profile in the ICBA online membership directory lately?
Click here to make sure it is up to date.
Don't forget to upload a current photo, add your firm's website,
select your practice areas, and more!